<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greatest kook ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.european-democracy.org/archives/2004/11/16/greatest-kook-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.european-democracy.org/archives/2004/11/16/greatest-kook-ever/</link>
	<description>EUlogical reflections</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Oomkens van Ommeland</title>
		<link>http://www.european-democracy.org/archives/2004/11/16/greatest-kook-ever/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Oomkens van Ommeland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.european-democracy.org/archives/2004/11/16/greatest-kook-ever/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>A strange result, yes, leaving aside the sms-votes anomaly - but the "protest vote" element clearly played a big role in delivering such a volume of votes for Fortuyn. If the poll had been taken before van Gogh´s murder, or 6 months later, the result would´ve looked different. I wouldn´t read too much into these slightly silly polls. Every single voter might have slightly different criteria for voting, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A strange result, yes, leaving aside the sms-votes anomaly - but the &#8220;protest vote&#8221; element clearly played a big role in delivering such a volume of votes for Fortuyn. If the poll had been taken before van Gogh´s murder, or 6 months later, the result would´ve looked different. I wouldn´t read too much into these slightly silly polls. Every single voter might have slightly different criteria for voting, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://www.european-democracy.org/archives/2004/11/16/greatest-kook-ever/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.european-democracy.org/archives/2004/11/16/greatest-kook-ever/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Right.

I'm flemish, i e not exactly a close friend of Hollanders ( Hollanders = randstad, thus excluding Limburg, the north; etc.)

What happened really?

The NL are truly commercial people ( " de waan van de dag"). The best.. is a TV game. That Fortuyn was elected. As the Big One. After the TV programme ( i e not commercial anymore) qiute a lot of SMS's came in. 

Result : W. V. Oranje became the winner.

No commercial potential, I presume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m flemish, i e not exactly a close friend of Hollanders ( Hollanders = randstad, thus excluding Limburg, the north; etc.)</p>
<p>What happened really?</p>
<p>The NL are truly commercial people ( &#8221; de waan van de dag&#8221;). The best.. is a TV game. That Fortuyn was elected. As the Big One. After the TV programme ( i e not commercial anymore) qiute a lot of SMS&#8217;s came in. </p>
<p>Result : W. V. Oranje became the winner.</p>
<p>No commercial potential, I presume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consolation</title>
		<link>http://www.european-democracy.org/archives/2004/11/16/greatest-kook-ever/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Consolation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.european-democracy.org/archives/2004/11/16/greatest-kook-ever/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>In fact, William of Orange won convincingly... after all the votes were counted (160.000 versus 130.000).  Fortuyn was assigned the title based on a very partial result because the sms-servers couldn't take the load in time...
Source in Dutch: http://www.nos.nl/nieuws/artikelen/2004/11/16/willemvanoranje.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, William of Orange won convincingly&#8230; after all the votes were counted (160.000 versus 130.000).  Fortuyn was assigned the title based on a very partial result because the sms-servers couldn&#8217;t take the load in time&#8230;<br />
Source in Dutch: <a href="http://www.nos.nl/nieuws/artikelen/2004/11/16/willemvanoranje.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nos.nl/nieuws/artikelen/2004/11/16/willemvanoranje.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.832 seconds -->
